Jump to content
The Official Site of the Calgary Flames


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

21 Excellent

About FlameFan4Life

  • Rank
    Advanced Member
  1. I think if we are trading JH we should be targeting a RW player at a good price and a solid depth player. We then sign Hall and a solid 3rd line shout down defenseman.
  2. Most will disagree with me but I would trade JH to NJ for Palmerri and what ever the best pieces we can get added to get a top line RWer. We then sign Hall to replace Johnny and play Lindholm with Chucky.and Baclund. I think this would give us the best looking top 6 we could hope for. Resign Hamonic and Gustufson to play on the third, with Valamiki back next year the roster is looking fairly good. Just my thoughts.
  3. Johnny / Mony / Lindholm Tkachuk / Backlund / Mangiapane Lucic / Ryan / Bennett Dube / Jankowski / Frolik Gio / Andersen Hannifin / Hamonic Kylington / Brodie To me this makes us a solid team with potential to be even better than last year. Ryan is a better center thanJankowski and can create with his passing so maybe he get's a bit more out of Lucic then most would expect.Bennett playing with Lucic would be excitting to watch, we could call them the bash brother or net crashers...lol Mangiapane is poised to produce at a high rate next season and with better line mates one can only wonder right. In addition I do not think Lucic is going to disappoint anyone, I was never a huge fan of us playing against him and admit the last few years in Edm he under produced to put it lightly but the style of players he was lined up with was different than he had success with IMHO. I think if he does come in and just focuses on his game and get's back to the idea of playing on an actually GOOD team we will all be pleased, at the least we all should expect alot more effort from Lucic in the first game than the total effort Neal put forward the whole last season.
  4. Why don't we talk about Hoffman? I would prefer him to Zucker personally.
  5. How can you say this? Backlund took years to fully develop. Janko could make another step forward next year, maybe by adding a physical side to his game just like Bennett has.
  6. You do the best you can when you can. You don't avoid making one improvement when the chance is there because of a maybe that isn't right there.
  7. Frolik was also listed as a LWer in the past and has played mostly RW. Zucker can play both wings just as well. Depending on the moves Calgary has planned outside of Zucker the Bennett addition to Frolik being swapped for Zucker makes some sense. Bennett will get a slight raise this year and with Frolik included that will most likely be a total of 6.5 or more for Bennett who plays on the third line and Frolik who the team already wants to upgrade for the second line. If the trade was to included a prospect that Minny can part with or a conditional draft pick coming back our way than I would be ok with that trade. I think Zucker would easily slot in to our top power play unit which was mostly bad last year. He also upgrades the RW, and could play anywhere on the wings in our top six if needed, which has huge value in its own. If Mang is expected to move up and play with Janko next year then Bennett would be moved down. I love Bennett's grit and heart but the team may need to cycle a few young guys in next year and Bennett's next salary could cover Dube and possibly Gawdin or Rudzika who I think have a good chance of making the fourth line next year. Don't get me wrong I would rather find a better way to move cap out like Brodie or even better Stone. I just think that at this point we are bound to see something we don't want to happen happen and we should prepare ourselves for disappointment.
  8. I like your thinking of Schenn, but I am of the thinking that Mang and Kylington wouldn't get that done. Your roster doesn't include Hathaway or Janko. I would love to believe that Lazar could replace Hathaway but I can't see him being half as physical. Removing Backlund makes no sense. I would rather find a more suited 4C and move Ryan up to 3C with Janko on the wing. I would revisit the Zucker deal. If they will still take Frolik and maybe a pick or prospect would be good. If we could trade Brodie to Montreal for Shaw Then...... JH/Mony/Lindholm Tkachuk/Backs/Zucker Bennett/Ryan/Neal or Jankowski Mang/Dube/Shaw or Hathaway There is NO way Neal get's traded. No team wants that contract after this past season, maybe next year if he turns it around but then we may want to keep him.
  9. Ok, I have a few opinions. I do think we as a whole played soft. We didn't need to be hitting like we were trying to kill them but more contact helps to disrupt play. Most of the games we allowed the Avs way to much room on there entries. If we had closed the gaps sooner and just created some contact they would of had to adjust but we as a team just backed into our zone and let them set up. They where very good on the rush. Johnny did play scared, if he had the puck and he even thought he was getting hit he got rid of it. Brodie was noticeably bad in three games and nothing to write home about in the other two games. Johnny would not take a hit to make a single play. Chucky was not drawing penalties or being his normal self. Neal may have a better year next season, but if it doesn't cost us to much and someone wants him let him go. Brodie should be moved for cap space our forward depth. A solid checking winger. Rittich should get the lump of starts next year and Smith as the back up is good for one year at the old guy discount.
  10. For sure, I would rather see us use a guy like Quine instead of Mang. I was mentioning an addition of a physical guy because "I" feel that that is all we are lacking at certain times. I would be fine with using Quine on the 4th line, but having that physical guy if we end up needing him would be good. This addition wouldn't even need to play every game, he could be put it on a game by game basis when we feel he is needed.
  11. The idea is very tempting knowing that our first is going to be such a late pick. The only way I could see it as a good trade would be if NYR took back a Stone type contract and the pick was a second that changes to a first if Hayes resigns.
  12. So with that said, do you for some reason believe that him coming to Calgary is out of the question? I understand the reasons why he took less money to be closer to his son, but if STL continues on the track they are on this season would it be hard to see him want a chance at a playoff run with a conference leader? Also I don't mean to argue, he was just the first guy to come to mind as to fit and need for grit I feel we have in the bottom six. It could be another player like Boyle, or someone else.
  13. Your point about the goalie is true , but my point is who do we have to call up that we can feel comfortable having back up in the playoffs? And as far as I know or can tell online Maroon is on an expiring contract right now.
  14. I am of the thought that if it ain't broke don't try and fix it. That being said , just because something isn't crying out as broken doesn't mean it is working well enough to be left untouched. If Calgary does anything prior to the deadline I can only see them adding to the fourth line. A heavy player with playoff experience. I know that the fourth line can be improved as we all do. Replacing Mangiapane with a player like Maroon could give us that physical edged with a player that can move up the line up in a case of injury. He would also add playoff experience. The cost for Maroon will not be high at all, a 3rd round pick at the highest and we would still have all of our existing pieces. The only real worry we as Flames fans should worry about is goalie depth. If one of the big clubs goalies get hurt what happens to our playoff run without a prove fall back?
  15. These guys only play together on the PP. Neal is playing in place of Chucky on the second and Chucky has been put with Janks and Bennett
  • Create New...