SIGN IN or REGISTER
USERNAME or EMAIL
PASSWORD

FORGOT YOUR USERNAME OR PASSWORD?

Jump to content


Photo

Goaltender Depth


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
30 replies to this topic

#1 DirtyDeeds

DirtyDeeds

    Advanced Member

  • SeniorMembers
  • PipPipPip
  • 6,933 posts

Posted 26 November 2012 - 04:50 PM

Last year at this time you likely would have said that Irving was going to compete with Karlsson for the backup position this year.

Starting this hockey season, had there been hockey to play, many feel that Irving was going to actually solidify his role as backup to Kipper.

Posted Image

As we continue on with this hockey lockout the above thoughts become blurred and less black & white.

Posted Image
-Irving has not performed yet to the abilities many expect of him.
-Taylor and Brust have both excelled in their performance on the Heat, at the very least gaining some future considerations. Both are under AHL contracts and not with the Flames however.
-Ramo's performance should get the call next season so he can compete for the backup position here.

Some other thoughts to consider:
Can Kipper perform to his usual level should we get back to playing hockey? (Assuming it will be a portion of this year or next season)
Is there going to be the logjam for backup next season that appears right now? or are we going to just let a few of those players contracts expire and move on?
How are Ortio and Gillies & Brossoit coming along and where do they fit into the future plans?

At the moment goaltending looks to be our deepest position for the next short term period.(2+ years)

#2 Carty

Carty

    Advanced Member

  • SeniorMembers
  • PipPipPip
  • 7,038 posts

Posted 26 November 2012 - 07:55 PM

At the moment goaltending looks to be our deepest position for the next short term period.(2+ years)


It is a good position to have depth...

Now, if they could only figure out a way to achieve the same at center and then right wing, we could really be a threat for years to come... And they just might be on their way to achieving that... There is always hope... :)

#3 flames1217

flames1217

    Advanced Member

  • SeniorMembers
  • PipPipPip
  • 262 posts

Posted 26 November 2012 - 08:08 PM

I don`t mean to sound cocky here but to me we certinly have a top 5 goalie propsect pool, for example:

Leland Irving- Before this year (and he will recover) he was arguably the best goalie in the AHL.

Brossiot: Best goalie in the WHL, Hands down with barely any competition. Plays a very oldschool style though, but certainly affective.

Ortio: A top 5 FEL goalie, has all the stuff on the bigger rinks, just couldnt hit his stride in the AHL. Should however be able to translte his style to the north american rinks. Needs to play more aggressive.

Gilles: Thus far has been the best Goalie in the NCAA, Pulling off some rediculas saves and always keeping his team in it.

Kari Ramo: Not truly a prospect anymore, but many russains will tell you he is the best Goalie in the KHL. Has had huge sucess over the pond and has greqt numbers to show for it.

Personally I would like to see 4 other teams with better goalie pools, I am certainly not calling us number one, I am just saying we are difinitly top 5.

#4 Keyro

Keyro

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 199 posts

Posted 26 November 2012 - 09:41 PM

The good is that we have a lot of up and comers.

Brossoit has a pretty good chance to rep Canada at the WJC
Gilles has found great success early on and just earned another accolade (hockey east defensive player of the week)
Ortio has also found success

The problem I see is that we have nobody to step up and take the starting role when kipper is gone. Irving is probably our most NHL ready goaltender, but to be honest my faith in him has been shaken because he's lost his starting job in abby.
Maybe in a few years we'll have the luxury of having two goaltenders with starting capabilities, (similar to Vancouver) and we can move one for a high price.

But I'm getting ahead of myself here....

#5 kehatch

kehatch

    Advanced Member

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPip
  • 5,298 posts

Posted 27 November 2012 - 06:06 PM

I don't think the Flames are in particularly good position regarding their goal tending depth.

Kipper is the best goalie ever to where the flaming C. All the respect to him for being one of the elite. But in keep in mind he has only played well under two coaches, and both were named Sutter. He wasn't good in San Jose after Sutter left. He was merely decent under Playfair. He wasn't very good under Keenan. Even under Brent Sutter he had an off season.

I am not counting him out for next season. It would be far from shocking that he is lights out again under Hartley. But given Hartley's offensive high tempo game it isn't impossible he doesn't play at an elite level.

Regardless, given his age, contract, and potential for retirement the Flames have to be concerned about life post Kipper.

And despite our larder of hopefuls we don't have any NHL proven and ready prospects to take the mantle. We aren't sitting with a Schnieder or Raask or even a Bernier.

I do like the number of prospects we have. In goalies I prefer a quantity of promising maybes then putting your chips on one or two high profile guys. You can make a case why every single one of our prospects probably won't amount to anything, and you would probably be right (heck, there are only 5 goalies in history to play more then 200 games for the franchise - only 13 to play a seasons worth of games!) Franchise goalies are a RARE commodity.

But you can also make a case why any one of them could be a Flames starter. That is true for Brust, Karlson, Ramo, Irving, Taylor, Gillis, and Brossoit. More bullets in the gun.

But in terms of our immediate future I am not thrilled. Anyone of those guys is a big gamble. None of them have shown they are ready to be a starter now. If we lose Kipper, or if he doesn't perform, we are taking a hard hard gamble.

#6 gsp393

gsp393

    Advanced Member

  • SeniorMembers
  • PipPipPip
  • 589 posts

Posted 28 November 2012 - 07:00 AM

In my opinion we need to give ramo the best opportunity for success. He is by far the most likely to be a future starter and this year with so much added talent in the k he is being truley auditioned. As much as I like kip I want to see ramo succeed and steal that starter spot. The sooner we can trade kipper the better. Maybe pull a stl with the two next year and depending how it goes we can strongly consider dumping kipper at deadline

#7 Crzydrvr

Crzydrvr

    Resident Draft Junkie

  • SeniorMembers
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,512 posts

Posted 28 November 2012 - 04:48 PM

In my opinion we need to give ramo the best opportunity for success. He is by far the most likely to be a future starter and this year with so much added talent in the k he is being truley auditioned. As much as I like kip I want to see ramo succeed and steal that starter spot. The sooner we can trade kipper the better. Maybe pull a stl with the two next year and depending how it goes we can strongly consider dumping kipper at deadline


I don't know about that, I'd say any of our guys have a shot at becoming a starter. But Ramo is older, so while that means he's more likely to have success right now, it also means that he might've peaked already. But I would definitely advocate AGAINST handing the reins to Ramo without even seeing him back on the NHL ice.

Personally, I think Joni Ortio is going to take a long time, but that the 3 or 4 year wait could very well be worth it. Ortio and Gillies have the most potential (but also a far greater likelihood of busting), Irving and Ramo are more likely to make the NHL in some capacity (with one already having done that), while Broisoit and Taylor could be wildcards. However, that's just my opinion.

#8 Heartbreaker

Heartbreaker

    Advanced Member

  • SeniorMembers
  • PipPipPip
  • 290 posts

Posted 28 November 2012 - 10:41 PM

Where's Karlsson?

Am I the only one that thinks it's not reasonable to give up on him just yet? I acknowledge that I may have missed something - I do live in Toronto.

#9 DirtyDeeds

DirtyDeeds

    Advanced Member

  • SeniorMembers
  • PipPipPip
  • 6,933 posts

Posted 28 November 2012 - 11:12 PM

Where's Karlsson?

Am I the only one that thinks it's not reasonable to give up on him just yet? I acknowledge that I may have missed something - I do live in Toronto.


Peter over at the Fan 960 said a couple days ago Karlsson is here in Calgary atm.

#10 Kulstad

Kulstad

    Resident Cat Wrangler

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,091 posts

Posted 29 November 2012 - 12:15 PM

Peter over at the Fan 960 said a couple days ago Karlsson is here in Calgary atm.


I think Heartbreaker might be referring to "why isn't Karlsson on people's talking points", and I have to agree with that. I haven't given up on Karlsson yet...in fact, I still prefer him over Irving when it comes to our backup situation. I realize Karlsson is probably only a short term (ie: 5 years max) option, but I still don't think he warrants being eliminated from conversation.

#11 Crzydrvr

Crzydrvr

    Resident Draft Junkie

  • SeniorMembers
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,512 posts

Posted 29 November 2012 - 04:05 PM

I think Heartbreaker might be referring to "why isn't Karlsson on people's talking points", and I have to agree with that. I haven't given up on Karlsson yet...in fact, I still prefer him over Irving when it comes to our backup situation. I realize Karlsson is probably only a short term (ie: 5 years max) option, but I still don't think he warrants being eliminated from conversation.


Karlsson is a borderline NHL backup. His numbers are at best average, and most people would say less than that. And given he's already in the prime of his career, those numbers don't bode well.

Sure he could pull off a late-bloomer, but very few guys do and it's unreasonable to assume that he will. Even as a backup he's no Ty Conklin or Dan Ellis. So I think at this point it's safe to assume that's he's played himself out of a longterm role with the Flames.

That's just my opinion however, and I can see why you think otherwise. Personally, I still would do the Karlsson trade again if I had the choice, he's already come farther than most 6th rounders do. But he is no bluechipper.

#12 Carty

Carty

    Advanced Member

  • SeniorMembers
  • PipPipPip
  • 7,038 posts

Posted 29 November 2012 - 08:00 PM

I'll start off by saying that from anything that I have seen or read I think Karlsson has a good mind set and personality for the job...

For any goalie to play backup to Kipper and to play so few games would be difficult...

For Karlsson to be more effective, he has to learn to use his size better...

There were a few occasions when Karlsson ended up on his back or sprawled on the ice when he shouldn't have put himself in that position at that time while the play was still alive, and he seemed to have difficult getting back up to at least back on his pads, to better follow the puck and then back up on his skates if need be... There were a few times he looked like an upside down turtle that had been tasered...

That said, he could very well learn how to overcome his shortcomings and turn into a better goaltender... Or, perhaps he might not... Time will tell...

To be fair, the team has also not played well in front of him all to often when he has been on the ice...

But at this point in time I would be more comfortable with a "Cujo" type player in the backup role if that was possible and Karlsson and Irving were the only other options...

#13 kehatch

kehatch

    Advanced Member

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPip
  • 5,298 posts

Posted 30 November 2012 - 08:59 AM

I would say Karlsons chances as a NHL starter are slim. But the goalies guild had this guy a top 15 prospect not long ago. They also cautioned patience as they anticipated it may take Karlsson time to adjust to NA. Especially as an occasional backup.

With Irvings future being shakey Karlsson may get the chance to turn things around.

#14 Heartbreaker

Heartbreaker

    Advanced Member

  • SeniorMembers
  • PipPipPip
  • 290 posts

Posted 30 November 2012 - 11:36 AM

Well that's just it, right?

They were a different (read: terrible) team in front of him (and any other backup since 2006), so maybe the backup has never really been the problem. I've always liked Henrik Karlsson. He seems to have a great attitude and work ethic, and I'll bet he's far better than we've seen.

I realize that goalie prospects are always projects as they adjust to the pace of the game (or the size of the rink), but I'm not convinced that anyone should give up on him.

I believe in people, and I think that the biggest contributing factor to whatever it is we'll see from this team will be directly related to the cultural change. Jay Feaster has done quite a bit to change the face of the team, and the new coaching staff will bring something entirely new to the locker room. I believe we'll see a lot more from players that aren't pigeon-holed into roles that they don't fit (see: Jay Bouwmeester), and that on the whole, we'll see a very different team. For better or worse. Can the fans keep up with the Flames?

Love.

#15 kehatch

kehatch

    Advanced Member

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPip
  • 5,298 posts

Posted 30 November 2012 - 12:55 PM

One thing is for sure: with the organization identifying Ramo as #2 on their depth chart this may be the last chance for Irving and Karlson to prove themselves. Both are (in essence) unrestricted free agents at the end of the season meaning unless they do something to make the organization take notice both will be probably be gone July 1.

#16 CastleMania

CastleMania

    Advanced Member

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPip
  • 2,665 posts

Posted 30 November 2012 - 01:04 PM

Well that's just it, right?

They were a different (read: terrible) team in front of him (and any other backup since 2006), so maybe the backup has never really been the problem. I've always liked Henrik Karlsson. He seems to have a great attitude and work ethic, and I'll bet he's far better than we've seen.

I realize that goalie prospects are always projects as they adjust to the pace of the game (or the size of the rink), but I'm not convinced that anyone should give up on him.

I believe in people, and I think that the biggest contributing factor to whatever it is we'll see from this team will be directly related to the cultural change. Jay Feaster has done quite a bit to change the face of the team, and the new coaching staff will bring something entirely new to the locker room. I believe we'll see a lot more from players that aren't pigeon-holed into roles that they don't fit (see: Jay Bouwmeester), and that on the whole, we'll see a very different team. For better or worse. Can the fans keep up with the Flames?

Love.

Has the team been different in front of backups, or has kipper kept us in games more than you are giving him credit for?

Serious question.

#17 Flyerfan52

Flyerfan52

    Elder Statesman

  • SeniorMembers
  • PipPipPip
  • 12,958 posts

Posted 30 November 2012 - 02:09 PM

One thing is for sure: with the organization identifying Ramo as #2 on their depth chart this may be the last chance for Irving and Karlson to prove themselves. Both are (in essence) unrestricted free agents at the end of the season meaning unless they do something to make the organization take notice both will be probably be gone July 1.

I'd like to see that chart. Would you happen to have a link?
On the Flames main page they only list (in alphabetical order) Irving, Karlsson & Kipper as roster players.

#18 Flyerfan52

Flyerfan52

    Elder Statesman

  • SeniorMembers
  • PipPipPip
  • 12,958 posts

Posted 30 November 2012 - 02:15 PM

Has the team been different in front of backups, or has kipper kept us in games more than you are giving him credit for?

Serious question.

I believe it's both.

Because Kipper can make miracle saves the team plays with more confidence in front of him. They'll take a chance they normally wouldn't.
Lack of confidence makes them grip their sticks a little tighter so they don't play as well in front of the backup.

That might change under a new system because the Sutters are known as defense oriented. Hartley sounds more ready to give them a bit of freedom on the ice.

#19 DirtyDeeds

DirtyDeeds

    Advanced Member

  • SeniorMembers
  • PipPipPip
  • 6,933 posts

Posted 30 November 2012 - 03:11 PM

Has the team been different in front of backups, or has kipper kept us in games more than you are giving him credit for?

Serious question.


Over the past few years one of the common things we heard from the players after we lost while playing a backup was that the team didn't play well enough, or the team didn't support the goaltender.

They should know better than anyone else.

#20 kehatch

kehatch

    Advanced Member

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPip
  • 5,298 posts

Posted 30 November 2012 - 03:31 PM

I'd like to see that chart. Would you happen to have a link?
On the Flames main page they only list (in alphabetical order) Irving, Karlsson & Kipper as roster players.


That was from an interview with Feaster (Late Summer or Fall) via the Fan 960 who clearly stated that Ramo is number 2 on their depth chart. I believe someone has that conversation linked on Calgary Puck if you are interested.