• Announcements

    • Kulstad

      Insults/Name-calling will not be tolerated   11/19/2016

      Tensions are high around this team and its fans.  It is very obvious that everyone here is passionate about the Flames, and has an opinion about what should be done to fix our unstable ship.  Stating your opinion is fine, it's exactly what these forums are for.   However, the name-calling and the insults are not required.   All insults/name-calling will be met with a zero-tolerance approach, regardless if you are a new person to the forums, or have been around since these forums began.   First-offenses will be met with a moderator-needs-to-approve-your-post for 3 days Second offenses will be met with a week-long suspension Third offenses will result in a perma-ban   If you have any questions regarding this policy, or would like to voice your concern about it, you are absolutely free to contact me directly.   We all love this team, and this game.  Let's continue to keep it civil around here.   --  Kulstad

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

DirtyDeeds

Lineup

234 posts in this topic

I really hope that Cervenka heals quickly (and works out for us) because otherwise our lineup at centre will be our downfall (again!)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My bets for once things get healthy would be:

FORWARDS

Alex Tanguay ($3.500m) / Mike Cammalleri ($6.000m) / Jarome Iginla ($7.000m)

Jiri Hudler ($4.000m) / Roman Cervenka ($3.775m) / Curtis Glencross ($2.550m)

Sven Baertschi ($1.425m) / Mikael Backlund ($0.725m) / Lee Stempniak ($2.500m)

Blair Jones ($0.650m) / Matt Stajan ($3.500m) / Tim Jackman ($0.613m)

DEFENSEMEN

Jay Bouwmeester ($6.680m)) / Dennis Wideman ($5.250m)

Mark Giordano ($4.020m / Chris Butler ($1.250m)

Cory Sarich ($2.000m) / T.J. Brodie ($0.742m)

GOALTENDERS

Miikka Kiprusoff ($5.833m)

Henrik Karlsson ($0.863m)

Until people are healthy I expect Stajan to get a shot in Roman's slot, and Horak to fill in for him temporarily.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My bets for once things get healthy would be:

FORWARDS

Alex Tanguay ($3.500m) / Mike Cammalleri ($6.000m) / Jarome Iginla ($7.000m)

Jiri Hudler ($4.000m) / Roman Cervenka ($3.775m) / Curtis Glencross ($2.550m)

Sven Baertschi ($1.425m) / Mikael Backlund ($0.725m) / Lee Stempniak ($2.500m)

Blair Jones ($0.650m) / Matt Stajan ($3.500m) / Tim Jackman ($0.613m)

DEFENSEMEN

Jay Bouwmeester ($6.680m)) / Dennis Wideman ($5.250m)

Mark Giordano ($4.020m / Chris Butler ($1.250m)

Cory Sarich ($2.000m) / T.J. Brodie ($0.742m)

GOALTENDERS

Miikka Kiprusoff ($5.833m)

Henrik Karlsson ($0.863m)

Until people are healthy I expect Stajan to get a shot in Roman's slot, and Horak to fill in for him temporarily.

Agreed. That's a decent skill line up. We are sadly lacking in the toughness category though. Here's hoping that's addressed fairly soon. Man I miss Prust.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The person I'm cheering for most is Hartley.

He's got a tough, tough job.

Cammy at center seems like a foregone conclusion...

I REALLY don't like the idea of a 40 goal potential winger moving to center.

A good, hard-working 4th line shuts our 1st line down imho. Because Tanguay and Cammalleri are good and creative, but neither are physical. It can't be all Iggy on the half-boards winning battles, he's supposed to be waiting for the feed.

Whether I'm right or misguided, that worries me a lot.

When I think of guys like Versteeg, Bolland, Kesler, Laich, Stoll, Carter, J. Staal etc, they aren't 1st line C's. But they will own Cammy at the dot imo, and that's where every teams success lies: intimidation at the dot.

You look at Thornton, Kopitar, Getzlaf, Toews, Datsyuk, Sedin, Backes et. al.

Is Cammy very intimidating to step to the dot with??

Give me a comparable please, I'm a little lost on this one.

It's hard to even discuss options, because there aren't any good ones.

Another big worry for me, is one of Stempniak/Hudler have to bury their chances, and I hope they do.

As for Cervenka, we've seen this "best player not in the NHL" play out a few times.

I definitely don't like the odds, but I like the contract.

My hopes aren't high. If he's a great 4C that stays with us I'm happy. I certainly ain't relying on him to save the team!!!

Kris Draper was a great NHLer that centered the 4th line, there's no shame in that.

Stephane Yelle was a huge part of almost getting us cup #2.

We don't emphasize 3rd and 4th line enough imho.

Lombardi, Bourque and Glencross are shining examples of why you need a line 3. I'd love to have them right now, in that role. Best PK in the league, and hardest 3rd line to play against.

We've gone too long promoting players out of the roles that helped us in real ways because our top 6 was so lean/disappointing.

Even Prust, Nystrom. We've severely underrated the bottom 6 in the past.

EVERYONE wins a cup due to the bottom 6 not being the weak link.

*edit

Imagine if lombo, glenny and bork had stayed in their 3rd line and pk roles.

Dang I'm getting angry again...to watch lombo and bourque fail at elevated roles pains me a lot. They were great in their proper roles.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The person I'm cheering for most is Hartley.

He's got a tough, tough job.

Cammy at center seems like a foregone conclusion...

I REALLY don't like the idea of a 40 goal potential winger moving to center.

A good, hard-working 4th line shuts our 1st line down imho. Because Tanguay and Cammalleri are good and creative, but neither are physical. It can't be all Iggy on the half-boards winning battles, he's supposed to be waiting for the feed.

Whether I'm right or misguided, that worries me a lot.

When I think of guys like Versteeg, Bolland, Kesler, Laich, Stoll, Carter, J. Staal etc, they aren't 1st line C's. But they will own Cammy at the dot imo, and that's where every teams success lies: intimidation at the dot.

You look at Thornton, Kopitar, Getzlaf, Toews, Datsyuk, Sedin, Backes et. al.

Is Cammy very intimidating to step to the dot with??

Give me a comparable please, I'm a little lost on this one.

It's hard to even discuss options, because there aren't any good ones.

Another big worry for me, is one of Stempniak/Hudler have to bury their chances, and I hope they do.

As for Cervenka, we've seen this "best player not in the NHL" play out a few times.

I definitely don't like the odds, but I like the contract.

My hopes aren't high. If he's a great 4C that stays with us I'm happy. I certainly ain't relying on him to save the team!!!

Kris Draper was a great NHLer that centered the 4th line, there's no shame in that.

Stephane Yelle was a huge part of almost getting us cup #2.

We don't emphasize 3rd and 4th line enough imho.

Lombardi, Bourque and Glencross are shining examples of why you need a line 3. I'd love to have them right now, in that role. Best PK in the league, and hardest 3rd line to play against.

We've gone too long promoting players out of the roles that helped us in real ways because our top 6 was so lean/disappointing.

Even Prust, Nystrom. We've severely underrated the bottom 6 in the past.

EVERYONE wins a cup due to the bottom 6 not being the weak link.

*edit

Imagine if lombo, glenny and bork had stayed in their 3rd line and pk roles.

Dang I'm getting angry again...to watch lombo and bourque fail at elevated roles pains me a lot. They were great in their proper roles.

I thought Cammy was going to be center too. Lately you hear that Tangs has been asked to work on his centering skills and one has to wonder. Hasn't Cervenka been playing wing overseas too? Aren't we taking another winger and trying to convert him to center?

I am not fond of playing good wingers out of position. It works okay to fill an injury hole short term but usually you don't see that working well long term. ie: they tried Kessel at center for the good portion of a year in TO with poor results.

Ive been happy with most of the 3-4 line combos the Flames have put on the ice the last few years. They have been good enough to allow roatating all 4 lines often enough. I would also say the 3-4 lines have been a strength for us.

If you heard the Mike Babchuk Interview a month+ back it would have settled your concerns somewhat. He said Hudler is a clutch player who brings it when you really need it. He also mentioned he is a stud on shootouts which is another area we deteriorated last season. I expect Hudler to perform up to or close to high expectations for us but not at center position.

Faceoffs with or without Cammy have been our Achilles Heal for years now. Faceoffs never seem to get addressed around here with the exception of token lip service once per year. When Big Chief kept daily(game) stats on faceoffs it pointed out how weak we were/are.

Last year I asked the question "where's the beef?" and I got a bunch of "we will be fine" answers. Seems I was right in asking and this year Feaster acknowledges we lack some grit. My comment there is we lack size and grit Mr Feaster so "where's the beef?"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think we need 2 lines. Cammy, Tangs and Iggy on line 1 will negate that.

All of our forward, team guys and hopeful leaders are on one line.

The 2nd line being passable was part of the role Olli played, and he's not here anymore.

He and Glencross had some chemistry, that starts, all over again.

The Jets are going to be really happy with that signing. Solid NHL centers with longevity aren't exactly easy to find.

And I'll reiterate, Olli never looked intimidated at the dot. Like, oh I don't know, Stajan, Backlund and Moss can.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well about time. They finally got a deal done.... I reserve the right to be pissed and promise to keep a long memory on this escapade.

I actually only came here to quote this.

Well said...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From what Tanguay said on the Fan 960, it sounds to me like they're gonna try him at Center and maybe move Cammy over to Left wing. Makes sense to me to have your playmaker at Center and your shooters on the wings.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK just a few quick points of concern:

1. Yes, this team is weak on the FO dot, but cant much be done about that for now...

2. Yes, this team is not as beefy as we are use to having and could be an issue in the west...

Now for the ups sides:

1. More skill

2. More speed

3. An actual shoot out threat

4. More youth (and energy that comes with)

5. More flexibility, Hartley is not like Sutter and thinks out side the box, here in many, flames fans included, are missing the bigger picture. Hartley likes to roll 4 lines, not a top 2 and bottom 2, therefore playing Cammy on the 3rd line and moving Glen X up to the first for grit if needed, can be done. Likewise, if they need the energy they can move Sven up to the 1st line...what ever, the lines get a more balanced distribution of the Mins, that is hard for any team to contain and play against. Point being the talent is there and can be spread to have decent scoring threat over 4 lines, vice containing it all in 2 lines. This is the way to go for this team and Hartley, unlike Sutter, has a broader vision and knows this.

At the end of the day, this is a much better team than last year, though there are some areas that are of major concern because we simply do not have players to address the issue(s). However, as mentioned, there are some tools we do have that we didn't have before. I'm a huge fan of rolling 4 lines keeps everyone fresh and with balanced lines this makes for a hard team to try an match lines, sure you shut down the top 2 lines bit what then if the bottom 2 are just as lethal in scoring how do you contain it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I disagree with the lack of physical forwards. Yes, our alleged top 9 is all skill. Guys like Aliu, Jackman, maybe Begin, and Especially Jones can be cycled through the line up in key roles. Blair Jones was one of my favourite Flame coming down the stretch last year before he broke his ankle on that PK. Remember, he played a real good, annoying game against SJ and he was a 2nd/3rd line energy centre.

Don't discount our physical play. If we need physical play, cycle Jones, Jackman, etc through the line up a bit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I will agree though, our top 9 forwards are very small on paper. This is scary for Flames fans as we are used to big, rugged, western canadian boys. This could be a good change. When Cammy played center last year in the stretch, the iggy cammy tangs line was very threatening. I'd expect even more moving Tanguay to C but I'm concerned about face offs of course.

Don't under value Cervenka this early. This guy wants to succeed. He's here for a reason. He has looked very good in the World Champ. games I have seen from memory. Also, I do not have a stat, but in his 5 games in the KHL with Lev, he was effective at the dot. He played big minutes as well. I have hopes he can secure our second line this year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Now for the ups sides:

1. More skill

2. More speed

3. An actual shoot out threat

4. More youth (and energy that comes with)

5. More flexibility

I agree about rolling 4 lines, but we definitely lack in the bonafide talent dept, imho.

We have a potential better mix of top 6 this year, but the top 6 still needs parts. Bartschi and Hudler would be a great start.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Who would you guys like to see in a shoot out for the Flames? I feel losing a lot of single points was the reason we didn't sneak in last year. Of course, there were many other reasons though.. Lol

I would like to see Cammy, tanguay, Cervenka, Baertschi, and Glencross get the majority of shootout attempts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The person I'm cheering for most is Hartley.

He's got a tough, tough job.

Cammy at center seems like a foregone conclusion...

I REALLY don't like the idea of a 40 goal potential winger moving to center.

A good, hard-working 4th line shuts our 1st line down imho. Because Tanguay and Cammalleri are good and creative, but neither are physical. It can't be all Iggy on the half-boards winning battles, he's supposed to be waiting for the feed.

Whether I'm right or misguided, that worries me a lot.

A lot of people worry about this I've seen on here. However, Kehatch did an analysis of point production vs. time on ice for the major lines at the end of last season, and that was actually our best line combination! To quote from his blog (link: )

Tanguay-Cammalleri-Iginla: TP (2.05%) P (3.95%) D (192.68%)

Tanguay-Stajan-Iginla: TP (3.18%) P (5.59%) D (175.79%)

Tanguay-Jokinen-Iginla: TP (3.74%) P (6.25%) D (167.11%)

Glencross-Jokinen-Stempniak: TP (2.02%) P (2.96%) D (146.53%)

Glencross-Jokinen-Iginla: TP (9.35%) P (13.49%) D (144.28%)

Glencross-Jokinen-Bourque: TP (2.15%) P (2.30%) D (106.98%)

Glencross-Jokinen-Moss: TP (3.58%) P (3.29%) D (91.90%)

Tanguay-Backlund-Iginla: TP (2.01%) P (1.32%) D (60.20%)

Cammalleri-Backlund-Iginla: TP (1.26%) P (0.00%) D (NA)

That means that per minute on ice, they produced almost twice as many points as the "average" line. Other lines with Tanguay and Iginla also produced over 1.5x the points.

But what should be noted is that the OMG line which many people remember fondly actually produced significantly fewer of our points during the season (3.29% vs. 3.95%) compared to the Tanguay-Cammalleri-Iginla line even though they were on the ice for 75% more time.

I don't think having Camilleri centering Tanguay and Iginla will be a problem in the slightest based on that.

Also, to borrow from a post I made back before the lockout, here's a realistic view of what goals would be produced during a full 82 game season (I haven't done the math to calculate for the reduced number of games):

Projecting the goals per player based on the average of the last 5 seasons (or project for Cervenka and Baertchi based on either KHL performance, or likely opening production respectively, not including this year) looks something like the following. Note that this doesn't take into account any possible chemistry within the lines, or this year's improvement by both Baertchi and Backlund which could easily increase their production, not to speak of others.

Tanguay (20) - Cammalleri(25) - Iginla (35)---------------80

Glencross (22) - Cervenka (20*) - Hudler (15)-------------57

Baertchi (15*) - Backlund (10) - Stempniak (15)-----------40

Comeau (14) - Jones (5) - Jackman (5)---------------------25

Bouwmeester (10) - Wideman (10)---------------------------20

Giordano (10) - Butler (3) -------------------------------13

Brodie (3) - Sarich (2)-----------------------------------05

Kipper

Irving

Total Goals ----------------------------------------------240

Based on last years goals per team that would put us 8 in the league for goals for (PIT, BOS, PHI, VAN, OTT(??), DET, CHI, CAL). Ahead of most of the teams who made the playoffs.

Of course not every player will hit average but for every player who has a bad year, its likely that another will have a better than average year, and HOPEFULLY that should balance things out. Especially with Hartly's new system. Of course there are more factors involved than that in winning and production, but assuming an average production year for everyone, we're actually in really good shape.

Yes, its possible that we don't get that from everyone, but there's no reason to think that yet.

I haven't included peripheral players who won't be on the opening roster, or potential callups, but presumably that wouldn't significantly affect overall production on the 4th or 3rd line where they're likely to be slotted in.

Looking at goals against

Feaster (or Hartly? Can't remember which) has said that he wants to see Irving (or Karlsson) play for about 20 games of the season next year.

Multiplying their average GAA by expected games played

Kipper - 2.60 * 62 = 161

Irving - 3.20 * 20 = 64

GA ------------------225

That would be 14th best in the league based on last year's standings. And most playoff teams do better than that.

Not exactly great, but hopefully Irving or Karlsson will see an improvement on a 3.2 average or be replaced.

Our differential therefore works out to +15. That's good enough for 11th in the league based on last year's stats. Clustered right in with New Jersey and LA.

So, if you just look at average stats (which should correct for anyone having a breakout year while others slump) we are a playoff team. No, we're not going to challenge for the division (or at the very least it is exceedingly unlikely), but anywhere for 4-8 is a reasonable expectation, based only on average stats of the players we have.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I will agree though, our top 9 forwards are very small on paper. This is scary for Flames fans as we are used to big, rugged, western canadian boys. This could be a good change. When Cammy played center last year in the stretch, the iggy cammy tangs line was very threatening. I'd expect even more moving Tanguay to C but I'm concerned about face offs of course.

There is another potential factor on this front:

Remember after the last lockout that the league cracked down on obstruction and it really helped bring fans back to the game. There is some rumbling that they might do a similar thing this time. If so, it would be good news for the type of team the Flames have.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A lot of people worry about this I've seen on here. However, Kehatch did an analysis of point production vs. time on ice for the major lines at the end of last season, and that was actually our best line combination! To quote from his blog (link: )

Tanguay-Cammalleri-Iginla: TP (2.05%) P (3.95%) D (192.68%)

Tanguay-Stajan-Iginla: TP (3.18%) P (5.59%) D (175.79%)

Tanguay-Jokinen-Iginla: TP (3.74%) P (6.25%) D (167.11%)

Glencross-Jokinen-Stempniak: TP (2.02%) P (2.96%) D (146.53%)

Glencross-Jokinen-Iginla: TP (9.35%) P (13.49%) D (144.28%)

Glencross-Jokinen-Bourque: TP (2.15%) P (2.30%) D (106.98%)

Glencross-Jokinen-Moss: TP (3.58%) P (3.29%) D (91.90%)

Tanguay-Backlund-Iginla: TP (2.01%) P (1.32%) D (60.20%)

Cammalleri-Backlund-Iginla: TP (1.26%) P (0.00%) D (NA)

That means that per minute on ice, they produced almost twice as many points as the "average" line. Other lines with Tanguay and Iginla also produced over 1.5x the points.

But what should be noted is that the OMG line which many people remember fondly actually produced significantly fewer of our points during the season (3.29% vs. 3.95%) compared to the Tanguay-Cammalleri-Iginla line even though they were on the ice for 75% more time.

I don't think having Camilleri centering Tanguay and Iginla will be a problem in the slightest based on that.

Also, to borrow from a post I made back before the lockout, here's a realistic view of what goals would be produced during a full 82 game season (I haven't done the math to calculate for the reduced number of games):

Projecting the goals per player based on the average of the last 5 seasons (or project for Cervenka and Baertchi based on either KHL performance, or likely opening production respectively, not including this year) looks something like the following. Note that this doesn't take into account any possible chemistry within the lines, or this year's improvement by both Baertchi and Backlund which could easily increase their production, not to speak of others.

Tanguay (20) - Cammalleri(25) - Iginla (35)---------------80

Glencross (22) - Cervenka (20*) - Hudler (15)-------------57

Baertchi (15*) - Backlund (10) - Stempniak (15)-----------40

Comeau (14) - Jones (5) - Jackman (5)---------------------25

Bouwmeester (10) - Wideman (10)---------------------------20

Giordano (10) - Butler (3) -------------------------------13

Brodie (3) - Sarich (2)-----------------------------------05

Kipper

Irving

Total Goals ----------------------------------------------240

Based on last years goals per team that would put us 8 in the league for goals for (PIT, BOS, PHI, VAN, OTT(??), DET, CHI, CAL). Ahead of most of the teams who made the playoffs.

Of course not every player will hit average but for every player who has a bad year, its likely that another will have a better than average year, and HOPEFULLY that should balance things out. Especially with Hartly's new system. Of course there are more factors involved than that in winning and production, but assuming an average production year for everyone, we're actually in really good shape.

Yes, its possible that we don't get that from everyone, but there's no reason to think that yet.

I haven't included peripheral players who won't be on the opening roster, or potential callups, but presumably that wouldn't significantly affect overall production on the 4th or 3rd line where they're likely to be slotted in.

Looking at goals against

Feaster (or Hartly? Can't remember which) has said that he wants to see Irving (or Karlsson) play for about 20 games of the season next year.

Multiplying their average GAA by expected games played

Kipper - 2.60 * 62 = 161

Irving - 3.20 * 20 = 64

GA ------------------225

That would be 14th best in the league based on last year's standings. And most playoff teams do better than that.

Not exactly great, but hopefully Irving or Karlsson will see an improvement on a 3.2 average or be replaced.

Our differential therefore works out to +15. That's good enough for 11th in the league based on last year's stats. Clustered right in with New Jersey and LA.

So, if you just look at average stats (which should correct for anyone having a breakout year while others slump) we are a playoff team. No, we're not going to challenge for the division (or at the very least it is exceedingly unlikely), but anywhere for 4-8 is a reasonable expectation, based only on average stats of the players we have.

Did you know that 67% of statisticians absolutely hate their job.

Offense stats are meaningless without +/-.

40G, 40A's and a -10 rating speaks volumes, for example.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you know that 67% of statisticians absolutely hate their job.

Offense stats are meaningless without +/-.

40G, 40A's and a -10 rating speaks volumes, for example.

Chuckles at the hate their job comment.

I would mention while pts to TOI stats have a place you can't make the judgement that Darth was making when he said the OMG line was substantially poorer.

The OMG line was a specific setup line to defend against the other teams top lines. They were not expected to produce points but rather get or keep the puck from the opp's and take it to the other end. Add to that playing the other teams top lines would pile up the TOI stat. This also freed up Butter from having to play our top line against their top line. In away games when you don't have the luxury of last change this can make a big difference.

Also the Iggy Tangs line did not start off well at all. Iggy started slow again and it was only when he was paired with Joker and Glenx did he finally break out and start to score. In fact Joker was leading the team in points followed next by Tangs and Joker kept the team scoring lead until late in the season.

Anyway I don't want to rehash Joker here just pointing out that those stats have a place but making some of those deductions is out of place. Your best players should get the most points and get the most ice time. If a line is given checking role there is no reason to assume or expect they should be producing at similar rates.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Who would you guys like to see in a shoot out for the Flames? I feel losing a lot of single points was the reason we didn't sneak in last year. Of course, there were many other reasons though.. Lol

I would like to see Cammy, tanguay, Cervenka, Baertschi, and Glencross get the majority of shootout attempts.

Tangs, Hudler, Cervenka, Baertschi and I reserve the right to play Marty Gelinas in overtime and clutch situations!

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I would mention while pts to TOI stats have a place you can't make the judgement that Darth was making when he said the OMG line was substantially poorer.

The OMG line was a specific setup line to defend against the other teams top lines....

I should clarify my previous post. I'm not saying that they didn't have a lot of other great points, they definitely did. But a lot of people are saying that "now that Joker is gone we're screwed for goals". Yes, he put up a very good number for us. But he wasn't the best player we had, and honestly, with what we've brought in, he's replaceable at a similar (or lower) cost.

That was what I was getting at. Not that the line itself was poorer on the whole. My bad on lack of clarity

Also the Iggy Tangs line did not start off well at all. Iggy started slow again and it was only when he was paired with Joker and Glenx did he finally break out and start to score. ...

This is true. Iggy had an unusually slow start (even for him). But I would think that was more an anomaly than a trend. (My opinion)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Camalleri-Tanguay-Iginla

Baertschi-Backlund-Glencross

Hudler-Cervenka-Stempniak

Horak-Stajan-Jackman

I'd reallly like to see Backlund an Stajan crack top six (heard Stajan is looking good!)

Tanguay-Backlund-Iginla

Camalleri-Stajan-Glencross

Baertschi-Cervenka-Hudler

Stempniak-Horak-Jackman

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I see too many different situations to really decide on what I think the lineups would be.. With the current roster ill give it a shot.

To start the season..

Camalleri -Tanguay - Iginla .../... Tangs - Cammy - Iggy

Glencross- Backlund - Hudler .../... Backs - Cervenka - Hudler

Baertschi - Stajan - Stempniak .../... Glencross - Stajan - Baertschi

Comeau - Jones - Jackman .../... Comeau - Jones - Stempy

Gio - Wideman

Jbow - Butler

Brodie - Sarich

*extra Babs, Carson, Smith

I think all the Center positions are up for grabs for who preforms in camp.

Cervenka skated with the team for 45 mins at windsport yesterday but his return date is still un known, a mixture of that and him not playing with any contact since.. November?? and new to the NHL I think he gets started on the 3rd line until he gets settled.

Backlund has been really good at wing in Sweden and has been under preforming at C in the NHL so maybe a switch at this level could be a good thing for him.

Stajan has been the whipping boy in Calgary and I'm not his biggest fan or saying he's a 1C but He did pretty well on the top line at points last year, With new coaches and a new system I'm hoping he can gain his confidence back and with the shortened season he has healed from whatever he was dealing with last year and can be more efficient.

I feel Cammy and Tangs will be swapping at the C position to start the year and if its unsuccessful Backs, Stajan, Cervenka all have a shot at it.

If Comeau is to have a bounce back season I don't think on the 4th line he will do that! I just slotted him there because I don't see where else he fits at the moment. It will all depend on how he does in camp. Last year he was one of our better physical players.

The fourth line is the most predictable with Jones and Jackman, If Begin preforms well on his PTO and gets signed the fourth line is nice and gritty but due to the depth I can see them all in the pressbox at times.

Horak will be a call up for sure he has talent but with all the skill we have already i think he would benefit from a full season in the AHL to find his consistency.

I would like to see Glenny and Sven together so he can stick up for him if anyone wants to take runs at him oppose to a line of say Sven Cervenka Hudler. At the moment we will have no choice but to have a couple soft lines, Its no secret we dont have much grit in the top 6.

The top 4 D man are pretty much a guarantee. I'm actually looking forward to the battle in camp for the bottom pairing.

Carson 6'4 210 pounds will be working hard to get back to the NHL will have the something to prove attitude which is always good.

Babchuk had a rough year I didn't like how Sutter used him and will have something to prove hes going to have to be strong in camp to beat out Smith, Brodie,Carson, outside of Brodie he has the advantage of actually playing games. With is big shot and offence minded style I can see Harley finding a way to put him to use.

Brodie I think is ready to be a full time NHLer but still will have to beat out the others in camp to make the cut.

I'm not worried about what's been dubbed "the Wade Redden rule" as Carson, Smith on one ways are not over $900,000 Babs is at 2.5m, I don't see those 3 out preforming Brodie but if they did Brodie's still on a ECL and wouldn't be shocked if he's the one who gets sent down.

WADE REDDEN RULE: Starting with this season, players in the minor leagues who make more than $900,000 a year will count against the NHL team's salary cap. And though teams will be allowed to use two buyouts in order to get under the cap for 2013–14, they won't be allowed to use them until after this season.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think Brodie, Baertschi and Backlund will get some decent ice time as they have actually been playing competetive hockey to some degree, although Sven has just returned from injury. Other than that, Cervenka and Hudler have been injured and there are very few Flames who have actually been playing, Babchuk aside, and the likes of Horak, Breen and Byron if they were to get the call. . I can't actually think of another team with fewer. With such a short camp to prepare, let's hope we do not stumble out of the blocks as there isn't much time to recover.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.