Jump to content
The Official Site of the Calgary Flames
Carty

Canes @ Flames 2pm Dec 14

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, cross16 said:

 

Officiating really not the story imo. They got it right. 

 

So they managed to get the call right after the review showed the player tagged up.

100% they dd not make the initial call for that reason.

 

But anyway, the team needed to be better on the play after the non-call.

Two D covering the puck carrier.

Weak attempt by Hammer.

 

Streak is broken so time to get back to winning.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, travel_dude said:

 

So they managed to get the call right after the review showed the player tagged up.

100% they dd not make the initial call for that reason.

 

But anyway, the team needed to be better on the play after the non-call.

Two D covering the puck carrier.

Weak attempt by Hammer.

 

Streak is broken so time to get back to winning.

 

 

 

That's what actually bothers me the most about the play. Even though the play was definitely onside, there's no way the linesman was mindful about how precise that tag up at the line had to be. Most officials would have blown that offside without question.

 

Regardless, this team had more than enough opportunities to score with pp's at the end. It's a learning experience for the group to not let one call derail their play.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Have to admit, it was a good play to wait for his guy to get back onside  and  Not seeing him. Fast thinking. 
 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
42 minutes ago, robrob74 said:

Have to admit, it was a good play to wait for his guy to get back onside  and  Not seeing him. Fast thinking. 
 

 

 

Haha, well played.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...